|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
NUMBER AND MYTH: THE ARCHETYPES IN OUR HANDS |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Yael Haft- Pomrock |
|||
|
Published:
Quadrant 1981 Vol 14 No. 2 |
|||
|
Don’t go my Soul, stay. Only with my will
you arise. If I do not |
|||
|
enmesh you in my body as the cord within
the net, through no fault |
|||
|
of yours yow will be lost. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
REBEL
IN THE SOUL 1 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
CHIROLOGY SERVES AS A
MIRROR to our soul. Etymologically the word “chirology” is formed by two
Greek words, chiro meaning “hand” and logos meaning ‘word’, and ‘language’;
thus, chirology is the language of the hand. Now language is, in fact, the
words we use to describe and express matter, images, spiritual or non-
descriptive emotions, sensations, feelings and thoughts. We know, however,
how limited and elusive this use of expression in words is. Yet, this is our
only tool of understanding so we keep on trying, using every symbol that
comes close to expressing in words, audibly and non-audibly, the many levels
any phenomena has, thus deepening our grasp of that which we try to express.
Language is a human device, and it is we as human beings that need this
enriching vehicle for we have an inner urge to know in order that we may
transmit onwards to others the meanings of our inner and our realities, and
all visible phenomena around us. |
|||
|
The connection of hand
and God’s creative power can be seen in Egypt during the reign of Amenophis
IV (1375-1358 B.C.). Atum, the one god, was depicted as a sun disc with rays
terminating in hands. The rays signify his life-giving power, and the hands
at their ends imply a connection between the hand as an acting organ and
God’s action. There is a parallelism between God’s creative deeds and man’s
hands as his creative instrument. |
|||
|
The expression “the hand
of God” or “the hand of fate “
depicts the hand, which is a human characteristic, as being endowed with the
dynamic aspect of God’s power. In other words, it is the archetype of action,
of creation. |
|||
|
In Exodus 17:11, it is
written:” And it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand that Israel
prevailed; and when he let down his hand Amalek prevailed”. Thus raising the
hand points to the reception of God’s blessing and power through the hand,
the hand being the intermediate, so to speak, between god and man. The blessing
power of the priests passes through the hands. |
|||
|
Thus the language of the
hand, or the hand as a symbol of God’s creativity, points to the constant
search for meaning of this very special organ. No hand resembles another,
hands have varieties of forms, of expression, and of lines in the inner palm
that are constantly changing. They are intimately connected to us as an outer
dynamic organ. Our connection, relationship, or attitude towards our hands is
complex and emotionally toned. Either we ignore our hands and make use of
them only as extensions of tools’ or we take the utmost care of its skin by
rubbing it with ointment and polishing our nails, growing them, tending
them. We may abhor our hands,
detest them, find fault with them, hide them, compulsively wash them, and
bite their nails and the skin around the nails. Very often we prefer the
hands of others to our own. We feel ours to be clumsy, peasant- like,
eagle-like, too fleshy, too bony and so on. At times, however, we do like
them, accept them as they are and even fondle them. One is struck with the
possible parallelism, of one’s attitude to one’s self and one’s attitude
towards one’s hands. We tend to react to others via their hands and their
expressions. Hands “speak” to us.
We feel our hands, yet our hands also act out feelings not under our
control, when, for instance, the hand hits, or shields from a possible blow
before one is conscious of the deed. So there is also a dialectical
relationship between man and his hands. |
|||
|
The hand has ‘mana’
through its role. The touch of a hand can comfort, soothe, and heal. Love is
expressed by touching and caressing. We need to touch in order to feel, and
we feel by touching. The hand symbolizes to man something about himself which
he needs to understand. It has the mystery that urges us to explore it, and
it has been a source of interest and learning since antiquity. |
|||
|
Hands prints made 20,000
years ago were found in the most remote part of the caves of Lascaux. Man had
to crawl through a narrow opening to reach the far end of the cave where the
hand prints were found. No one knows exactly what they mean. We can only
surmise that his hand prints signified for him the need to state “I am”. The
crawling may represent a second birth, a re-birth into the consciousness of
being; i.e., ”I am a person, a man, and my hand print is my signature.” |
|||
|
Before I continue with
the hand from the point of view of its numerical archetype, let me briefly
state the difference between chiromancy and chirology. In olden times it was
chiromancy that was practiced in ancient Egypt and in India. It was used as a
means of divination by medicine men and diviners for good and bad omens. The
Assyrians, Hebrews, Chaldaeans, Greeks, and Romans studied chiromancy
seriously and it was highly valued. There were two trends in chiromancy: one
was linked with astrology, and hence the astrological names to the fingers
and mounts, and the other with esoteric knowledge- the deepest meaning of the
inner process. In the |
|||
|
Renaissance chiromancy
was studied in the universities Germany and England. With the advent of
rationalism the use if chiromancy was taken over by gypsies and other
so-called entertainers, and it wads discarded from serious scientific studies;
yet, this is all on the surface. The mystery of the hand, and the inner urge
to know what lies hidden in the lines that are uniquely personal have never
stopped intriguing inquisitive minds. The other trend of chiromancy, which we
now call ”chirology”, continued to occupy serious investigators. |
|||
|
Chirology deals with the
psychic structure, the inner meaning of what is, and with psychic processes.
It analyzes a situation and a structure. It forms a thread from kabala
through alchemy to psychology and archetypal psychology. |
|||
|
Marie-Louise von Franz
states that the archetypes “form structural dispositions in the
unconsciousness, invariable in themselves, although their pictorial and
representational appearance in human consciousness exhibits variations.” In a
footnote, she adds that the archetypal image “ is always variable, but behind
these variants stands a constant, non-perceptual pattern” i.e., the archetype
per se. Looked at chirologically, we all have five fingers on each hand. Each
finger stands for a different archetypal image; however, each one of us has
fingers different in form,
pattern of dermatoglyphics, in expression, and inner divisions. (The fingers have
usually three divisions in their inner side.) Each finger, then, represents
the personal, unique form of the archetypal images, behind which lies the
basic archetypal pattern. |
|||
|
“Number”, as Marie-
Louise von Franz says, “is an archetypal representation or idea which
contains a quantative and qualative aspect”3. ”Number in its
original form indicated the quality or the pattern of a structure”4. It unites matter and psyche. |
|||
|
Let us see the pattern of
the structure of the hand as the original first five numbers that are the
foundation of all the quantative and evaluative aspects of our own inner and
outer reality. |
|||
|
Etymologically the word
‘number’ which is in Greek,’ Arithmos’ stems from the same root as ‘rhythm’
which is ‘rhythmos’. So originally number was rhythm5. Chirologically, we could say that the
hand conveys and is the image of the psychic rhythm. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
THE HAND AND ITS NUMERICAL
ARCHETYPES |
|||
|
|
|||
|
1.
The hand as a whole is
a totality which encompasses structure, potentialities, conscious and
unconscious dynamic aspects as well as behavior patterns. We can say that in
its totality it represent the Self, encompassing all archetypal
manifestations, as nascent and evolving, the Self, in its dynamic facet as
well as its centering function. Jung states:” The Self has always been, and
will be, your innermost center and periphery, your scintilla and punctum
solis. It is even biologically the archetype of order and-dynamically- the
source of life 6”. |
|||
|
The palm is a confined, determined
structure or gestalt. It has boundaries and in a sense has a static form
which is inflexible in its outer part. Yet inside, in the inner part of the
palm, in its, so to speak, hidden, interior side, it is vibrating with life
through the changing lines that furrow it and the “mounts” that surround it.
The palm is further connected; it stems from the body and is its extension.
The palm, then, is the ground, the “mother”, the wealth of femininity in its
instinctual, sensual, imaginal and unfathomable depth. |
|||
|
The inner palm is divided
into three areas: The proximal, lowest zone pertains to the instinctual,
imaginal, creative, and chaotic realms, i.e., the collective unconscious. The
middle area pertains to the practical and rational realms; the upper zone,
close to the fingers, pertains to emotional and spiritual aspects. |
|||
|
The fingers which are
free, flexible, mobile, and extend boundlessly outward are potencies; they
are sperma that can fertilize this ground, activate it, and energize it. They
are the masculine energy of action. Yet, as they stem from the “mother” they
are also bound to it. Here we have the Yin and Yang that form a whole. |
|||
|
2.
The chirological
division of the hand divided into palm and fingers brings us to the beginning
of differentiation in the wholeness. As already said above, the palm is the
ground, expressed in the inner and outer reality, whereas the fingers
represent the archetypal personal images. How the fingers sit or stem from
the palm may show us the way these two parts or worlds relate. We can see harmony
between them when the fingers sit well i.e., where there is smooth connection
between fingers and palm. On the other hand, when there are too- protruding
knuckles between fingers and palm, we may say that there are conflicts
between the “potencies” and reality; it is not smooth, the flow is inhibited.
Knuckles from obstacles to the free flow of energy. So we may encounter
disharmonies between the archetypal images portrayed in the fingers or in
only one or two fingers, and their malfunctioning or negative functioning as
seen in the palm, which is the seat of the manifest world and the
“underworld”. |
|||
|
The expression of the
palm and fingers is of paramount importance. In a recent research project 7
about the differences between the hand of schizophrenics and those of a
normal control group one of the decisive factors was that of the expression
of the hand. All but one of the fifty schizophrenics participating in the
research had hands that were either expressionless or of weak expression,
whereas all the controls had lively expressive hands. Expression implies
life, vivacity, content, substance, something flowing, and a way of relating.
It is difficult to measure expression, and even more to define what it is. It
has a Janus character about it. On the one hand, there is the expression of
the form and the structure; on the other hand there is the expression of the
current psychic state, which varies and changes ”hand- in-hand” with the
psychological changes a person undergoes. The expression of the structure of
the hand and the expression of the present psychic state may coalesce; yet,
very often they do not correspond to one another. We may encounter a strong
expression covering a basic frailty, or a rigid expression defending inner
fears, depression, or depersonalization. Lack of vitality and depression may
be seen in a well-structured form. We can control the expression of our hand
gestures, but we cannot control the expression of our psychic state and basic
structure as portrayed in our hands. Hands are vitally connected to our
autonomous nervous system. An expressive hand shows the pulse of life within
the personality. The lack of expression or rigid expression shows the lack of
it, or its rigidity. A weak expression shows the weakness of life. We can
find expressive fingers with an expressionless palm that is either weak or of
a rigid expression; this may indicate a lively archetypal image of potency
but a barren or weak ground, a situation which may culminate in a psychosis.
We may have the reverse- unexpressive fingers with an expressive, lively,
motoric palm, meaning that the “potencies” are not alive, although the ground
is ready to “conceive”. “The inner
palm portrays the dynamic functioning of the archetypal images. So we may
have the lively potencies, the fertile soil, yet the malfunction of these
potencies or aspects- which is the usual neurotic condition. To elucidate
this with an example: An index finger which is long, squarish, well- proportioned
and expressive, indicates an aspect of dominance, power and leadership. This
aspect can be handicapped as indicated by the inner palm in the
manifestations of other aspects, such as negative thinking, or destructive
criticism, which may completely curtail the manifestation of the leadership
potentiality, and cause conflict and suffering. |
|||
|
3.
If we look at the
whole hand as signifying the number “one,” the division between the four fingers and the palm can be
looked upon as signifying number “two,” it is clear that number three, then,
would be signified by the thumb, which, protruding out of the palm, yet away
from the fingers, represents the dynamic aspect. It has two phalanges as
compared to the usual three phalanges of the fingers which could convey that
it follows another law or rule. The “rule of thumb” means man’s will, man’s
command, in contradistinction to God’s will. The thumb is a human
characteristic; of all the species only the primates have a thumb, although
undeveloped. |
|||
|
Marie-Louise von Franz
postulates that “each number taken qualitatively is understood to function as
a preconscious psychic principle of activity; each number must be thought of
as containing a specific activity that streams forth like a field of force.
From this standpoint numbers signify
different rhythmic configurations of the one- continuum” 8 Number
three serves as a reconciling element between two and one, and as an
energizing and dynamic function, which is, in fact, man’s task. |
|||
|
Jung’s exposition with
regard to these numbers is most revealing when we look at it from this point
of view: ” Unity, the absolute one, cannot be numbered, it is indefinable and
unknowable; only when it appears as a unit, the number one, is it knowable,
for the ‘other’ which is required for this act of knowing is lacking in the
condition of the One. Three is an unfolding of the One to a condition where
it can be known- unity becomes recognizable; had it not been resolved into
the polarity of the One and the Other, it would have remained fixed in a
condition devoid of every
quality “9. This means that the three is needed as a
discriminating factor with regard to the one and the other, the two. It
reminds one of the uroboric state where the snake eats its own tail. The
uroboric state, as Neumann wrote, is the phase in which the ego is dormant,
like the embryo in the womb, and has not yet emerged as a conscious complex. 10 |
|||
|
The three, as the thumb,
portraying the human prerogative, serves as the condition for consciousness.
Chirologically, the quality of the thumb, among other factors, determines the
potentiality for differentiation, volition, and execution. In the research
into characteristics of schizophrenia as manifest in the hand, the thumb
played a major role in its expression and quality, i.e., potentiality. |
|||
|
Yet the three can also be
seen from a different angle. It is said that “the One is not only the root of
the whole, for the One is only form and the whole is form and matter
combined, but three is the root of the whole for the One symbolizes form and
two represents matter” 11. Here the three is the root of the
whole. We could say that the thumb which, in its position in the hand is
rooted in the vital sphere of the inner palm, and yet is independent of it, being the most flexible in
movement of all fingers, denotes, in its “threeness” the ability of
consciousness, of discrimination, of evaluation and execution. It serves as
the basis for man to become aware of the whole and its parts, of its
capabilities to create, to hold, to do, i.e., to become the dynamic agent
involved in the activity of the psyche- the ego in the service of the Self,
the psyche. |
|||
|
4.
Number Four is
signified by the four fingers. Marie-Louise von Franz denotes the number four
as a stabilizer by means of creating boundaries .12 The four fingers serve as potential
stabilizers of the personality as they contain the conscious and unconscious
sides. The first finger, and part of the second, which belong to the radial
side of the hand, define the conscious side. It is the more flexible side of
the hand and has an affinity with the thumb. The other part of the second
(middle) finger, the third and fourth fingers- the ulnar part of the
hand-belong more to the unconscious side. How the fingers relate to each
other can reveal aspects of consciousness versus unconsciousness. As an
example: A person holding up his hand showing the first and second fingers
standing fourth, whereas the third and
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
I.
Thenar line: “Life line.” |
|||
|
II.
Lower Transverse line:” Head line.” III.
Upper transverse line: ”Heart line. |
|||
|
IV.
Stabilizing line:” Fate line.” Dissected
line: Diagonal lines. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
fourth are held in, may
convey a split between the conscious and the unconscious side, showing an
outer attitude different from the inner. Or, another example: A person
holding his first finger bent inward, second finger tending towards third and
fourth fingers, may show feelings of inferiority, lack of self- confidence,
and be more inclined to the unconscious parts of his personality. |
|||
|
The fingers are divided
in their inner facet into three parts, corresponding to the three divisions
in the palm. These three divisions denote the different “worlds,” or levels
of existence in the world: a)The lower part of the finger, the phalange next
to the palm, represents the world of earthly aspect, of matter, of basic
needs, of materialism, and concreteness. B) The middle phalange represents
practicality, common sense, and reasonableness. C) The upper phalange
represents the world of spirituality, abstract formulations, and ideals. |
|||
|
The lengths of the
phalanges differ from person to person, from hand to hand and also at times,
from finger to finger. Accordingly, each archetypal image may have three different
modes of expression or levels of existence. We can thereby discern the level
of the archetypal aspect working within the personality. As an example: When
the middle phalange is the longest of the three, that means that the world of
practicality is uppermost in the archetypal layout, i.e., the archetype will
manifest itself primarily in the practical realm. As the archetypes are
psychic structures, or “structures in process,” 13 it is most
important to discern their level of existence, especially when the division
is different in each finger. Structure is something given; chirologically
“structures in process” means the interrelations and interaction of every
part of the hand with every another, be it the fingers, the lines or the
mounts (elevations) and the changes they may undergo. |
|||
|
For example: In the index
finger, the middle phalange longest, may mean that in the realm of dominance,
perception and orientation; the world of practicality is the ruler. Whereas,
in the second finger, the upper phalange is the longest, which may indicate
that in the realm of thoughts and intellect, the spiritual or abstract world
is the ruler. Third finger, upper phalange longest, would tend to show an
aptitude to abstract art forms, and fourth finger, second phalange shortest,
could indicate among other things, lack of practical ability in business, for
instance. These divisions within
the fingers can already cause difficulties and disharmonies, yet can also be
a sign of versatility and compensation. |
|||
|
4.
With regard to the
“two,” as palm and fingers, the thumb is “three”; with regard to the
“four”-the four fingers- the thumb is the five, the one which is added to the
four. This makes it not only complete, but whole. |
|||
|
The thumb stands in
relationship to the other fingers, either in opposition, or encouraging and
complementing them as a focusing factor. Both three and five are single, odd
numbers, and in that respect ‘masculine’. In China, number five stands for
the element of earth. Earth as number fine symbolizes aspects of femininity.
The heirosgamos is signified by number five, and it is in the earth that the heirosgamos
takes place. In Jung’s words, ”It is the spiritualizing of the earth.” 14 |
|||
|
The thumb, as number
five, contains both masculine and feminine aspects. Gershom Scholem cites
Genesis 1:24 “…the earth brings fourth living soul ” to mean the spirit (ruach)
of the earth is a “vital potency dwelling in the earth” 15. The
thumb is rooted in the thenar mount which represents the vitality and
instinctual forces, i.e., the earth with its vital potencies. From thence the
thumb draws its force. We can suggest that with regard to the “three” the
thumb represents the ego-complex, whereas with regard to the “five” the thumb
would signify more the wholeness of the personality. |
|||
|
It is interesting to note
that, whereas the four fingers have mythic or astrological names-Jupiter,
Saturn, Apollo, Mercury- the thumb has none. It is solely human. Only man can
become conscious of his archetypal images. The hand without the thumb is
without “a hold”; we can hardly use it. Archetypal images without the
counteracting “I” remain undifferentiated and the psyche cannot be grasped.
Only through his human ability can man find meaning and have insight into the
working within, which he did not create. This can be done only with the aid
of our “thumb.” The ability to make use of, to endure and to suffer under the
archetypal manifestations, by our thumb, so to speak, can enrich our lives
and make them worthwhile, valuable, with more meaning and with more soul. |
|||
|
|
|||
THE HAND AND ITS
MYTHICAL ARCHETYPES
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We say we feel a thing
in our “finger –tips,” implying that we know it very intimately, untuitively,
from our depth. When there are peaks in the finger –tips, it may be a sign
for special sensitivity for the quality of things, whether of a material or
an intellectual nature. Fingers are thus used as reminders. We count, type,
And play musical
instruments with our
fingers. We also play with our fingers when nervous or excited. They have a
life of their own; who does not remember as a child how one’s fingers
portrayed animals and other imaginative figures by their shadow projection on
the wall? |
|||
|
Looking at the fingers from
their outer side, their
expression and form may reveal to us modes of characteristics. For example:
fingers that turn outward at their ends or are bent over to the outside-
appealing to the “other,” so to say- may show openness and curiosity, whether
on a very simple level of sheer love of gossip, or of mental curiosity or
spiritual openness, depending on the many other factors in the hand. |
|||
|
How each finger stands
out and relates to the other fingers is also indicative of the modes of
behavior of the specific characteristic portrayed in the finger. To
illustrate: The index finger stands behind the middle finger, which is broad,
heavy looking, with a rigid expression, long and strong, while the third and
fourth fingers bend inward and the thumb, too, is bent in- could be
translated into words as follows:” My stand in the world is not sure and I am
afraid of failure, so I’d better stay behind my rigid, critical ideas and persona, although my feelings
and relationships may be hurt and suffer”. |
|||
|
If we let our fingers
“speak,” we have whole dreams before us- personifications of dramatic psychic
situations, where “I” can observe the “me” and the “others” in me in an
imaginal situation which pertains to a present state. The hand serves as a
mirror of the manifestations of archetypal forces inhabiting our personality,
with the ego as an observer as well as a participant. |
|||
|
Each finger stands for
different inherent characteristics. Ever since the Middle Ages – and perhaps
even earlier- chiromancy held that each finger belonged to a specific planet.
Present day chirology, however, tends to do without planetary names, and the
fingers are designated by number; The index finger bears the number “one,”
the middle finger, “two,” and so on.
Only the thumb has no number just as in antiquity the thumb had no
planetary association. |
|||
|
If number is an
“archetypal image” and “a bridge to the myth,” which is psychical, let us
turn back to the astrological planets of chiromancy, as they are the gods
that were projected onto the sky. Becoming acquainted with the gods and their
myth in our own hands makes them feel very near, inside ourselves, as permanent occupants of our psyche in
a decisive and real sense. As Hillman says, “there is always a god in what we
are doing” and that “the gods are archetypal premises within all experience
and all attitude.” 16 |
|||
|
The mythical
astrological names of the fingers and elevations in the inner palm are as
follows: |
|||
|
|
|||
|
First finger
Jupiter/ Zeus Middle finger
Saturn |
|||
Third finger
Apollo
|
|||
|
Fourth finger
Mercury-Hermes |
|||
|
Thenar elevation Venus/ Aphrodite |
|||
|
Ulnar proximal elevation
Luna/ Lilith |
|||
|
Middle proximal
elevation
|
|||
|
(between Venus and
Luna)
Neptune |
|||
|
Middle Ulnar side
elevation
Mars Ares |
|||
|
|
|||
Some of the most important gods with their specific characteristics,
attributes, and function inhabit our psyche. But what about the goddesses,
who besides Venus/ Aphrodite and Luna, and her dark aspect, Lilith, are not
mentioned? It is a very patriarchal outlook to have femininity symbolized
only by these two aspects, disregarding the other goddesses at work in women
and men alike. So chiromancy had only male gods depicted in the fingers.
Fingers are the ‘potencies,’ the daktyloi, the servants, sons, lovers of the
Great Mother Goddesses: Rhea, Demeter, Kekate, and Aphrodite. According to
myth, Rhea, who was worshipped in Asia Minor as Mater Oreia “mountain- mother,” had fled to Ida
to give birth to Zeus. There, when the birth pangs started, she supported
herself with both hands on the soil. From where her fingers pressed into the
earth of the mountain sprang spirits and gods in the number of her fingers.
These are the daktyloi who are always at her service. This is one aspect of
the fingers.
|
|||
|
While working with
chirology, I have become convinced that each finger is associated not only
with a god, but with a goddess as well. So the fingers portray gods that have
their feminine counterparts as wife, sister, and daughter. The goddesses are
there too in the fingers, personifying the various feminine aspects
manifested both in women and men alike. In men they portray the different
anima figures. In women they portray unfathomable representations of various
types of femininity in both their positive and negative aspects, which only
now women recognize as belonging to their psyche, It is no wonder that while
these thoughts were shaping themselves into chirology, numerous psychological
articles and books were written about the goddesses. This phenomenon evolves
from the patriarchal consciousness and belongs to the “new consciousness.”. |
|||
|
It points toward an end
to strife for power between matriarchal and patriarchal attitudes, and toward
a new meeting of the masculine and feminine aspects in the personalities of
both men and women. |
|||
|
The goddesses portrayed
in the fingers are: Hera and Hestia, first finger; Athena, middle finger; and
Artemis, third finger. All, save Hera, are known as virgin goddesses who are
somewhat masculine and who stand alone. Let us turn to the first |
|||
|
finger in both its
masculine and feminine aspects. |
|||
|
|
|||
INDEX FINGER-JUPITER: HERA AND HESTIA |
|||
|
|
|||
This is the finger belonging to the world,
in Spier’s words, it is “the finger of the World.“17 It is connected to the “outside.” It shows
our way of dealing with the world, our orientation, adaptability, our power
of observation, sense of perception, the use of our senses, our sense of
organization, of domination, and ambition. It may have similarities with the
function of sensation. It shows the way we handle and stand in the world- our
world. Its length, form and expression, as well as its relation to the other
fingers and the combination of the lines in the inner palm, convey how all
these characteristics work and manifest themselves in our psyche.
|
|||
|
Jupiter, or Zeus, is the
mighty king whose victories and powers of domination are connected with the
feminine by marriages, and copulations, and in relations with both goddesses
and mortal women. In Homeric times, he symbolized the recurrent union of
heaven with earth, yet somehow he was always secondary to the feminine in
power. 18 |
|||
|
We could say that our
stand in the world, our feelings of superiority or inferiority, inner
confidence or lack of it, and our ambitions, infect all spheres of our
personality. They are deeply connected with and dependent upon our
relationship to the basic feminine realms, to the goddesses- the “mother” in
her life-giving “milk” as well as its poisonous, devouring potions, intrigues
and jealousies. |
|||
|
Astrologically the planet
Jupiter stands, among other things, for the social side of the personality .19 This planet is associated with the
idea of expansion. The images of Jupiter/ Zeus’ attributes may well tell us
in a more lively, pictorial way his functions, for example: Thunderbolt-
immediately brings to mind the image of the punishing finger, the accusing or
threatening finger, which is the index finger. The crown and the throne can
be looked upon as symbols of power and dominance, which can be seen in a long,
expressive, strong index finger. The eagle, kind of the birds, the spirit of
the sun, is a spiritual principle- Jupiter as prime mover. 20 |
|||
|
The feminine aspects
attached to Jupiter are Juno (Hera), as ell as Hestia, sister/ daughter of
Zeus. Juno (Hera) portrays the symbol of the matron, protector of the wife,
goddess of childbirth. Jupiter and Juno stand for the collective attitude and
public life. A well- proportioned, lively expressive and prominent index
finger will convey a good ability as an organizer, authoritarian capabilities
and teaching abilities. |
|||
|
Hestia’s celibacy and
virginity, as well as her belonging to the household and being the keeper of
the earth 21 can also be recognized in the index finger. For
instance, an index finger separated from the other fingers, yet long and
expressive, portrays a Hestian alones and independence. Yet, when the finger
is long and heavy or rigid and well apart from the other fingers, would
indicate the Hestian loneliness and dryness. An index finger conic in shape
and tending toward the middle finger, while its first phalange, the one close
to the palm is longest, shows good cooking abilities and care for the house
and children, other Hestian characteristics. The self- sacrifice of Hestia
can also be seen in an index finger straight and outward or even a bit bent
but outward, away from the other fingers. It may indicate the scarifying of
inner development because of the duties of the house and dependents. If it is
also short and heavy- looking, it assumes also Hestia’s anonymity, hard toil
and carrying the heavy burdens of the world in a self- sacrificing fashion,
depending of course on other components in the lines. Hestia can be seen in a
man’s hand as well as in a woman’s hand. |
|||
|
The finger held inwardly
towards the inner palm, short, lacking vividness will convey a “ fallen
Jupiter,” lacking confidence and unauthoritative. |
|||
|
It becomes more
complicated when there are qualities which, because of inner difficulties,
are not developed or lived. This can be seen in a well-proportioned
expressive finger held inwardly or hidden behind the second finger and it can also be seen in the
lines in the inner palm. A too-long index finger and strong in expression can
mean an excessively domineering person, which, together with other
components, can show extreme lack of consideration up to callousness, tyranny
and also inflation. |
|||
|
We can say that Zeus as
father; husband; or son tends to
signify the world in its outer facets, whereas Hestia as mother and virgin
signifies the flame of the inner world. A mother who can “mother” herself, a
virgin who implies the enfolding, the becoming, the and dignified aloneness
of what one is. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
MIDDLE FINGER-
SATURN/ ATHENA
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Being in the middle, it
stands between Jupiter and Apollo, between the “world” outside and the inner
world. This finger is usually longer than the rest of the fingers, as if it
needs a “ higher view” over the other fingers. It is stabilizer between these
aspects, the world of activity, consciousness and the world of feelings,
evaluating, imagining, relating, and intuiting. It stands between the
conscious attitude and the unconscious urgings and longings. In Freudian
terms it also serves as the super-ego. It shows our intellectual potentials,
the kind of thinking- whether it is heavy, lively or dull. Along with the
head line in the inner palm, it gives us some more dynamical aspects of this
function; whether our thinking is deep, shallow, materialistic, optimistic,
depressive, inquisitive or cunning and so on. It is important to note to
which finger the middle finger tends, whether to Jupiter or Apollo. Tending
towards Jupiter would emphasize more the reality aspect, extraversion,
outside. Tending towards Apollo would mean more introversion, and influence
of the feelings and of the unconscious. Its relation to the other fingers and
the palm (having a protruding knuckle between the finger and the palm or a
smooth relation to the palm,) its form, its length and expression would
convey how our thinking is working within our psyche and how it influences
our personality: As an example: A too-long middle finger, rigid in expression
with a high elevation under the finger may convey a too-severe super-ego, an
unharmonious or bad negotiator. |
|||
|
Astrologically, Saturn
conveys limitations (organically it is associated also with acid formation in
the joints), old age, restriction, inhibition, slow change, selfishness,
narrow- mindedness, severity, dogmatism, cruelty, depression and hardship,
yet- in its positive aspects – perseverance, practicality, caution,
constructiveness, responsibility, patience, solidity, endurance, self-
discipline, thrift and trustworthiness. 22 |
|||
|
In humanistic astrology
Saturn’s function is the process of focalization and differentiation, growing
to a sense of personal identity, security but also inertia. Saturn symbolizes
in alchemy a dark, low, not-yet thought-out content which must be brought up
into consciousness, the severed head. “Saturn is the head” as von- Franz says
.23 |
|||
Chirologically,
the stabilizing line (which in chiromancy is called the ‘fate” line), when it
rises up from the ulnar proximal part of the palm, the luna (or moon)
elevation towards the middle finger, signifies the person’s need for an
individual way. It is a focusing
energy for self- realization, which stems from the depths of our unconscious.
This is a diagonal line, and diagonal lines are specifically a human
attribute. Of-course, this line can also stem from other parts of the palm.
Where it stems from and where it ends portrays the stabilizing function or
force in our personality. The lack of this line does not mean that there is
no stabilizing or focusing factor- then, the form, expression of the middle
finger and its relationships to other fingers and components in the hand and
the thumb, will convey these factors. It is in this sense that we can accept
the term ”fate”. Our life cycle is deeply connected to both moon and Saturn’s
cycle. The moon cycle is approximately 29.5 days and Saturn’s cycle, 29.5
years. Our life cycle may consist of three Saturn cycles (29*3=87). Each Saturn cycle represents, so to
say, a possible different lives of being, reaching towards Senex wisdom and
Sophia.
|
|||
|
The
middle finger can also portray not only the Senex consciousness but also the
pure’s illusions, when, for instance, the upper traverse line- called the
“heart line- turns upwards towards and under the middle finger in a sharp
turn. His feminine counterpart, Lua, Dame Melancholy, can be seen in a middle
finger turned inwardly or held in, bent into the inner palm, together with a
long, down- sweeping ‘head” line falling onto or towards the luna part of the
palm, showing depression. On the other hand, a middle finger square in form,
together with other components in the hand, may show technical thinking
abilities, which belongs to the feminine side of Saturn characteristics:
namely, Athena .24 |
|||
|
Athena
was born from the head of Zeus and as such she belongs to the head: the
middle finger is the “head” of our fingers. She is the father’s daughter who
is connected to him only in an ambivalent form. Born without a mother, she
belongs wholly to him. The myth does mention Metis as the mother of Athena,
who, while pregnant, was swallowed by Zeus. With Hephaistos’ help Athena
sprang out from Zeus head. Metis means ‘mind ‘, advice, practical insight,
understanding and thinking through. From this we see that Athena’s mother,
too, is also the “head.” Psychologically, this means that the mother of a
woman who has an inner image of Athena is may be an intelligent, practical,
rational, animus- possessed, i.e., full of ideas and opinionated, without
warmth or softness. |
|||
|
The
ambivalent relationship between daughter and father and her identification
with him is her way of defending herself from the threatening masculine
principle to her femininity. On the one hand she wants to be accepted and
admired by her father so that he will help her. On the other hand she is
always afraid of being swallowed by the masculine principle, so that, by
identifying with her aggressor, she thinks she saves herself but in fact
loses her femininity. |
|||
|
Another
possibility as a ”mother of Athena” is a very weak mother, who is completely
dominated by the father or is so identified with him that she becomes his
“spirit,” his “mirror.” The Athenian woman then again has no mother but a
mirror: And we all know the problems of women who are only mirrors of and for
their men. Yet the mirror can also be the saving possibility of overcoming
the negative mother image, the Gorgon .25 It was Athena who gave Perseus the
mirror. The mirror represents the ability to reflect. It is through the
capacity for reflection that we can withstand the vicissitudes of our inner
dramas. |
|||
|
Athena
is always alone, yet a friend to man. She is as if she were a man, ‘man
-to-man,’ 26 and a virgin. She is called Athena Pallas, meaning
“maiden”, or Athena Parthenon, meaning “virgin”. However, it is not the
virginity of Hestia nor that of Artemis. She is not anonymous or self-
sacrificing, nor shy, nor alluring. She is practical, efficient, present in
the here- and – now and complete. She is also technical. Anaxagoras called
her “Athena of the crafts.” 27 Technical capabilities can be seen in a squarish middle
finger, which is expressive and not too long. A woman whose ‘Athena’ is
dominant should learn to accept her aloneness- not loneliness- in masculine
world and learn to use her reflecting ability. |
|||
|
I
have dealt a length with Athena because she is an inner image for most women
of today. She occupies the middle and the central part of our psyche, but
also of our hand, the middle finger being literally central. We are all
daughters of the patriarchal culture and dominance of the masculine
principles within. We belong to it. We either tend to identify with it,
becoming more “man” than “woman”, victims of our animus, rational and
intellectual- or simply animus- possessed. Or we tend to feel very inferior
and without value. We are all very conscious of and engrossed in our bodies-
in dieting, trying to eliminate our fatness, become thin, airy, empty,
hollow- bellied, in order to become an image, a presence felt but not
touched, not realizing our value as daughters of our “fathers.” |
|||
|
|
|||
|
THIRD FINGER-APOLLO |
|||
|
This
finger belongs to the sphere of feeling, inner life, relationships, creative
abilities and capabilities and a sense of form inherent in man, not belonging
to the domain of will, rational thinking and ambition. It is the world of the
muses, art, literature, poetry, music. It can also belong to egocentricity,
opportunism and gambling. Its form and especially its length and expression,
and its relation to other fingers and the lines in the inner palm will
disclose to us the intricate aspects working within. The length of the three
inner divisions of the finger will denote the world which is dominant;
whether it is spiritual and abstract, practical or sensual, material and
base. |
|||
|
Astrologically,
Apollo corresponds to the sun, which is associated with the heart and spine,
with the source of will. It is not the will- power, but the source of it,
creativity and generosity; sun as potentiality. 28 In humanistic
astrology the sun ‘s function is sustainment, its process purpose- giving and
its purpose is integration. 29 It also shows pomposity, arrogance, egocentricity,
narcissism, vanity, and extravagance. |
|||
|
Both
Jupiter, index finger, and Apollo, third finger, “need” the mediating middle
finger, Saturn, in- between and higher, to temper them and reconcile them.
They are gods of opposites. |
|||
|
To
illustrate: A too- long and dominant index finger which represents authority,
dominance and ambition, made hide the spiritual, creative faculties of an
expressive but rather short third finger, especially when it is bent in or
hides behind the middle finger. Then the Apollonian retreat and withdrawal is
apparent, aided by Saturn’s restrictive powers. |
|||
|
On the other hand, a too- long third
finger, one as long as the middle finger, will emphasize ego- centricity or a
gambling inclination which means also gambling tendencies in and of one’s own
life, that take no need of a normal
length index finger’s orientation and stand in the world. The
Apollonian demand for worship is here drawn to its extreme. Apollo’s birth is
connected with suffering. Being the sun of Leto, the goddess of the night, he
comes from the night, from the dark, as all creative things do. Every creativity apparently, true to
the myth, has to suffer greatly before its birth. Inner life, relationships,
spiritual insights, and clarity are all the result of suffering. Suffering is
their birthright. |
|||
|
Capabilities
that can be seen in the third finger, among other things may serve at times
as the ‘key’ to a creative outlet, a truly Apollonian advice in distress .30 Apollo’s whole nature is said to be
musical. 31 It is the ‘ music’ in the heart form that makes it
art, thus transforming activities of different faculties into “art”. A third
finger lively and expressive, helps transform activities of man into “art,”
in no matter what type of activity whether it is the art of cooking, the art
of speech, the art of writing or communication, even the art of forming relationships and the art of
healing. Apollo is an archer- god who shoots his arrows from afar, considered
as the god of sudden death, but also as the healer god. In this he is
connected to Paieon, whom Homer calls the physician of the gods. Paieon was a
surname of Apollo. 32 |
|||
|
The
following example comes to mind of a woman whose hand revealed abnormal
structure with regard to the fingers; each finger was of a different form and
expression; her second finger, Saturn, especially, was smaller than the rest
of her fingers, thus unable to fulfill its task of stabilizing, reflecting,
being responsible. It was, so to say, controlled by diverting and quite
opposite tendencies, Jupiter and Apollo. Yet her Apollo, third finger, was
exceptionally expressive, well developed and long, as was the fourth finger.
She was a very special artist, a painter and a poet. Her Apollo was her inner
physician. |
|||
|
He
is also the god of divination and prophecy, whose oracles were given by the
priestesses, the Sibyls. The story of Cassandra, to whom Apollo, with his
kiss, breathed the ability to foretell the future, but took from her the
ability to persuade, brings to mind the line of intuition, which in the inner
palm is to be found under the third finger. We all have intuitions,
prophesying dreams and premonitions. Yet they are not usually persuasive in
themselves; we remember them later. The line of intuition shows us what kind
of intuition is at work; is it productive, imaginative, based on experience.
I.e., reproductive or combative? Is it guiding or misguiding? Helpful or
fearful? |
|||
|
The
twin sister of Apollo is Artemis. Artemis belongs to nature, to beasts (her
symbols are a she- bear and a stag). She is goddess of her chase and forests
and called ”the archeres.”33
She is youth, and dancing, fleeing to the wilderness, unapproachable,
shy but enchanting, alluring yet evasive. Especially in a woman, one finds a
third finger proportioned and expressive with a lively line of heart (the
upper traverse line), rather straight, tending towards the mount of Jupiter
under the first finger; this exactly portrays Artemis striking down mortals
with her arrows. It is an evaluating, even cold, feeling yet very benevolent
to those who appreciate and honor her. Artemis can, like other goddesses,
also be found in a man’s hand. |
|||
|
The
goddesses are the different’ anima’ aspects or images of the masculine. They
also represent different forms of femininity in women. There is no one kind
of femininity. We usually distinguish femininity to imply softness,
acceptance, relating, containing, caring, uterus- like confinement,
passivity, or the opposite- its devouring and castrating, even chaotic,
aspects. |
|||
|
When
we look into the different images of the goddesses that are portrayed in our
fingers- Hera, Hestia, Athena, and Artemis- we see that each one of them
portrays a different kind of femininity, which is inherent in all of us. Yet,
they are all alone and virgin. Somehow, the deepest aspects of femininity in
us all, women and men alike, are alone, are “just- so,” they are what they
are, complete unto themselves, yet also always becoming, the possibility of
the recurrent becoming of that which enfolds, true to its nature. |
|||
|
Understanding
these distinctions and accepting and realizing their functions may help both
men and women to know their inner counterparts and to find ways of living
with them. Not falling into identification with the archetypes is an
unconscious way by letting our lives be ruled and over- powered by them. |
|||
|
|
|||
FOURTH FINGER- MERCURY
|
|||
|
The little finger is the
most paradoxical and complicated of all the fingers as its name indicates:
Mercury- Hermes in all its guises and intricacies. Hermes is associated with
the number four .34 In Teutonic mythology he appears as the
Scandinavian Wotan or Odin. The fourth day of the week still bears his name,
Wednesday. 35 |
|||
|
This finger pertains to an
ability of expression in writing, speech, acting, negotiating, playing music,
a sense of form and style, diplomatic capabilities, scientific abilities,
persuasion, trickery and theft. It deals also with sex and
interrelationships, and relationships with the other sex. We find its
parallel characteristics in astrology where Mercury is denoted as an
individual and intellectual planet with a flair for Languages. 36 He show quickness and “ versatility
of mind, inventive gift and scientific leanings.” 37 As with all
the other fingers, the form, length, expression and relationship to other
fingers and lines will convey some of the Mercury- Hermes drama in our
psyche. |
|||
|
Hermes, being a phallic
god, connected with sexuality, can be seen in the fourth finger’s expression,
its length, its relationships to the other fingers and in the palm; the lines
that come up to it and touch it, together with the elevations of Venus and
Luna as well as Mars. Mars and Luna are situated on the ulnar side under the
fourth finger, while Venus is opposite to the fourth finger on the thenar
elevation on the radial side of the palm. In other words, fourth finger’s
sexuality is the way we relate inwardly and outwardly to all spheres of life
in ourselves and with others. Our sexuality conveys our essence at the
deepest level. In Hebrew, the sexual union is expressed by the word “Yada”
which means knowing, it is not an acquired knowledge, but an inward one.
Lopez, in a Hermes- like manner says it is a bit differently: “ Our sexuality
marks the roads we tread in life like mile-stones, thus our sexual images,
fantasies, and imagination participate in the psychological commerce at the
borderline of our psyche marking both the internal and external realms of |
|||
|
Life. 38 |
|||
|
Hermes is the servant of
the gods, their messenger, he is on the go, on the way, always
connecting. “He is enodios, (“by
the road”) and hodios (“belonging to a journey.”) 39 |
|||
|
The fourth finger is
usually smaller than the other three, yet is of invaluable importance. It
“serves” all the other fingers, as it helps, or leads on, or leads away the
capabilities and characteristics portrayed by the other fingers. It is
closely connected to Apollo, who gave Hermes the Iyre, in music-playing,
acting, painting, writing, to mention just a few. It gives rhetoric ability
to Saturn’s order and law. |
|||
|
Mercurius is also the
herald of consciousness, of conscious differentiation. A lively expressive
fourth finger whose length is the length of the thumb- the thumb being
developed and expressive- together with diagonal or curved lines coming
towards it in the palm, conveys the Mercurian animating and psychic movement
that stirs and enlivens all realms. In Jung’s words:” Isolated in the bottle
he corresponds to the ego and the principle of individuation. Freed from his
prison Mercurius assumes the character of supra- personal atman. He becomes the one animating
principle of all created things, the Self.” 40 |
|||
|
The fourth finger is
intimately connected and belongs to the ulnar part of the hand, the seat of
unconscious Luna. It has the double nature of creativity, inspiration,
intuition and prophecy, but also the danger of being submerged and lost in
Luna-cy. 41 It will depend upon the third and fourth fingers and
the thumb and the lines in the inner palm, which of and how Luna’s
characteristics are manifested. |
|||
|
The fourth finger is also
connected on its ulnar side with aggression or fighting spirit: Mars or Ares,
god of war and blind brutal courage, and his two attendants, Deimos (fear)
and Phobos (fright). This brings to mind Pan, panic, and paranoia. The Ares-Mars elevation under the
fourth finger is the seat of aggression in both its positive and negative
connotations. It shows the ability to persevere in the face of difficulties,
for we need a fighting spirit to attain whatever we need to attain in our lives.
It is also the seat of suspicion, mistrust and paranoid inclinations.
Diagonally, it is connected with the whole elevation of Venus/ Aphrodite, the
goddess of fertility of all nature and goddess of love, in its noblest as
well as in its most degraded forms- sexuality as the essence of life and
death .42 It being
fourth Eros and Harmonia, and also the Herm- Aphrodite. |
|||
|
The process of
individuation goes through the Hermaphrodite. 43 This diagonal
connection between Venus- Aphrodite and Mercury-Hermes is found only in the
human hand, as are all diagonal lines. The mount of Venus-Aphrodite is the
source of vitality, passion, instincts, earth, the ground from which stem the
thumb. Venus- Aphrodite “is the ‘anima’ without, leading men into outer entalglement”.44 |
|||
|
She needs the other. The
“me,” for its proper development, needs Venus’s warmth, and life-giving
energy. It needs body, body that emerges from the unfathomable sea, the
deepest unconscious realms. Yet it also needs its Hermes/ Mercurius. Together,
diagonally, it connects to the self. “The self has its roots in the body, in
the body’s chemical elements.”45 Lopez says that “with the Hermaphrodite psychology begins
to be psychology in the deepest sense. The Hermaphrodite introduces us to the
complexities of the masculine and feminine with a unique image of symmetry.”46 This diagonal line indicates, among
other things, the ability for inner development. The animated psychic
movement connects two principles: masculine-feminine; body-spirit; where the
soul is the connecting principle, the ‘diagonal’ line, the human line. |
|||
|
A well –proportioned,
expressive, vivid and developed fourth finger and diagonal connection to the
mount of Venus indicates Hermes as protector and helper ,47 and especially as servant, servant of
process individuation, “at whatever level the process moves”48 Yet he also needs a well- framed and
developed thumb. |
|||
THE THUMB
|
|||
|
Whereas all the other
fingers (digits) bear the names of gods, no god’s name is attached to the
thumb. It stands alone, naked and lower. Yet it is, as mentioned many times
before, the human prerogative. It represents the ”I” that thinks, wants,
speaks, wills, and executes, i.e., the seat of volition (in Rallo May’s encompassing
use of the word ) .49
It also pertains to the power of execution and the thought that is
involved in it. It belongs to the ego- complex, ego consciousness, ego powers
and identity .50 |
|||
|
It is important to assess
its expression and quality, i.e., potentiality. By potentiality we mean its
degree of ability to differentiate, discriminate, to evaluate, to suffer
frustrations or persevere. The expression will indicate how these aspects
operate within us at the present moment; either not at all, rigidly, weakly
or strongly or in a lively way. Together this will indicate the amount and
the particular personalistic dynamic way the ego in its volition and
execution and the reflection attached to it, work. The higher the
potentiality of the thumb, the more developed the person is. We may suggest
that the potentiality of the thumb serves as an indicator of the severity of
pathology. In the research (1980) as to characteristics of schizophrenia in
the hand, it was even statistically proven that one of the decisive factors
of the severity of the pathology was an unexpressive thumb of low
potentiality. |
|||
|
The higher the
potentiality, the better our
ability to observe, react appropriately and accept our “pathologies,” our
soul’s sufferings and pains. Hillman’s use of the phrase“ pathologizing
psychologically” is “to find a place for it, a way of accepting it, in
general and as a whole… to know what it might be saying about the soul and
what the soul might be saying by means of it.”51 |
|||
|
The ‘low’ position of the
thumb with regard to the other fingers enables us to hold, for instance, the
pen one writes with. It is in the hollow space between the thumb and the
fingers, between ‘I’ and the gods, that things get done. Only by counteracting, relating,
encountering the ‘me’ with the not-me, the ‘I’ with the archetype that
manifests in my being, the ‘persons’ living in my abode, can I discriminate,
insight, understand, take a stand or run away, be overpowered, be rigid or
numb. A too-strong thumb, as an
example, with a prominent Jupiter and Mars could bring about an inflation of
the ego. Metaphorically, being
‘low’ and smaller than the other three fingers (except the fourth finger,
which is normally of the same size) is to keep low and humble, and human. |
|||
|
Mercury, fourth finger, as
opposed to the thumb is like the “trickster” opposite to the “fool” of the
Tarot. Rebecca Warner 52 says that the fool “represent both the
soul starting on the path of knowledge, foolishly supposing that he carries
all that is necessary within himself and the reborn soul at the end of his
journey of initiation, who has discarded all except that which is essential“.
Newman contends that the “fool” is a pathetic figure, because we are all
pathetic in the struggle with our lives, but it is out of this Auseinandersetzung
with our lives that we become conscious. 53 |
|||
|
In Jung’s words: “Without man’s reflecting consciousness
the world is monstrously meaningless; for according to our experience man is
the only creature that can determine ‘meaning’ at all… Since a creation
without the reflecting consciousness of man has no recognizable meaning, the
hypothesis of a latent meaning invests man with a cosmogonic significance, a
veritable raison d’ etre.” 54 |
|||
|
Becoming conscious is but
one step, a most necessary step without which all is meaningless. Yet what is
vitally at stake and needed is the courage and the inner freedom to
experience and feel the images with the ‘I’ not as a victim, but as a
participator. |
|||
|
Looking at the worlds that
are in our palms, in our hands, we become aware and conscious of the forces
that inhabit these worlds of ours as well as our possibilities of dealing
with them, suffering with them and under them. It can start a process that
may mean, perhaps, our soul’s basic need for the union of knowing and
experiencing at the centre of our being, via the hand, the microcosmos of our
macrocosmos, a dot of meaning in an awesome and tremendous cosmos. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
NOTES |
|||
|
1.B.
Reed, Rebel in the Soul, trans.,B. Reed (London:Wildwood House, 1978). |
|||
|
2.Marie-Louise
von Franz, Number and Time (London: Rider and Co.,1974), p.31. |
|||
|
3.
Marie- Louise von Franz, On Divination and Synchronicity (Ontario: Inner City
Books, 1980), p.72. |
|||
|
4.
Ibid., p.68. |
|||
|
5.
5. Ibid., p.88. |
|||
|
6.
C.G. Jung, psychology and religion, CW 18, par. 1638. |
|||
|
7.
Y. Haft-Pomrock and Y.Ginat, “Difference between schizophrenics and
normal control using the chirological (hand) testing .“ 1980 (Not yet
published). |
|||
|
8.
Von Franz, Number and Time, pp.74-75. |
|||
|
9.
C.G.Jung, “A Psychological Approach to the Trinity”, “Psychology and
Religion, CW 11, par.180Citedby von Franz, Number and Time, p.102. |
|||
|
10.
Erich Neumann, The Origins and History of Consciousness (New York:
Harper Torchbook, 1962) , p.276. |
|||
|
11.
Inb Gabirol, cited by von Franz, Number and Time, p.104, n. 9. |
|||
|
12.
VON franz, Number and Time, p.74. |
|||
|
13.
James Hillman, Re- visioning Psychology (New York: Harper and Row,
10975), p.148 |
|||
|
14.
C.G.Jung, Mysterium Coniunctioonis, CW14, par. 207. |
|||
|
15.
G. Scholem, On the kabalah and its Symbolism (New York: Schocken
Books, 1965) , p.164 |
|||
|
16.
Hillman, op. cit., pp.227, 228. |
|||
|
17.
Julius Spier, The Hands of Children: An Introduction to Psycho-
chirology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1944), p.23. |
|||
|
18.
W.F. Otto, The Homeric Gods (London: Thames and Hudson, 1954), p. 34 |
|||
|
19.
H. Binder, Oral Communication in 1970. |
|||
|
20.
F.A. Yates, The Art of Memory, (London: Peregrine Books, 1996),
p.280. |
|||
|
21.
Karl Kerenyi, The Gods of the Greeks (Middlesex: Penguin Books,
1958), pp.91-92; see also S.A.
Demetrakopoulos, “Hestia, Goddess of the Hearth,” Spring (1979), pp.55-73. |
|||
|
22.
Derek and Julia Parker, The Complete Astrologer (London: Mitchell
Beazley, 1971), p.98. |
|||
|
23.
Marie-Louise von Franz, Interpretation of Fairytales (New York: Spring
Publications, 1979), pp.117-18. |
|||
|
24.
James Hillman, “On Senex Consciousness,” Spring (1970), p.160. |
|||
|
25.
Murray Stein, “Translator’s Afterthoughts”, in K.Kerenyi, Athene
(Zurich : Spring Publications, 1978), pp.76-77. |
|||
|
26.
Otto, op. cit.,p.5. |
|||
|
27.
Ibid.,p.56. |
|||
|
28.
Ibid. |
|||
|
29.
James Hillman, On the Necessity of Abnormal Psychology: Ananke and
Athene in Facing the Gods (Dallas: spring Publications, 1980), p.27. |
|||
|
30.
M.R. Meyer, The Handbook for the Humanistic Asteologer (New York:
Anchor books (doubleday), 1974), p.71. |
|||
|
31.
IBID. |
|||
|
32.
Kerenyi, The Gods of the Greeks, p.143. |
|||
|
33.
Otto, Homeric Gods, pp. 80-90. |
|||
|
34.
Karl Kerenyi, Hermes Guide of Souls (Zurich: Spring Publications,
1976), pp.21-22. |
|||
|
35.
Larousse Encyclopedia: Mythology (London: Hamlyn, 1959), pp.252-55. |
|||
|
36.
Hanni Binder. Oral communication in 1970. |
|||
|
37.
C.G. Jung, Psychology and Alchemy, CW 12, par.88. |
|||
|
38.
R. Lopez-Pedraza, Hermes and his Children (Zurich: Spring
Publications, 1977), p.4. |
|||
|
39.
Kerenyi, Hermes Guide of souls, p.15. |
|||
|
40.
C.G. Jung, Alchemical Studies, CW 13, par. 287. |
|||
|
41.
K/Newman, A Psychological interpretation of the Tarot Major Arcana
(Diploma thesis) 1975. |
|||
|
42.
For an excellent exposition of this problem, see: Marion Woodman, The
owl was a Baker’s Daugher (Toronto: inner City Books, 1980); and M.T. Colonna,
“Lilith, or the black moon,” journal of analytical psychology (1980) |
|||
|
43.
Lopez-Pedraza, op.cit.,p.17. |
|||
|
44.
Rene Malamud, The Amazon Problem in Facing the Gods (Dallas: Spring
Publication, 1980), p.57. |
|||
|
45.
C.G. Jung, Alchemical Studies, CW 13, par. 242. |
|||
|
46.
Lopez-Pedraza, op,cit.,p.17. |
|||
|
47.
Ibid.,p.5. |
|||
|
48.
Ibid.,p.6. |
|||
|
49.
Rallo May, Love and Will (New York: Dell Publishing Co., 1961). |
|||
|
50.
C.G Jung, Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, CW 8, par. 611. |
|||
|
51.
Hillman, Re-visioning Psychology, p.57. |
|||
|
52.
Cited by K. Newman, op.cit. |
|||
|
53.
Ibid., p.138. |
|||
|
54.
Cited by M.-l. von Franz, Number and Time, p.165. |
[Home Page] [About us] [Members] [Training program] [Links]
[Psychotherapy school] [For The
Public] [Society's Journal] [Contact
us]